Creating Barrier-Free, Broadband Learning Environments

Appendix A: Evaluation Report

CANARIE Project: Broadband Access to Education

Post-Study Questionnaire

Participant #: ____________________________

  1. On a scale of 1-5 (1=very poor & 5=very good) please rate the following:
  2.   Standard ASL Video Acted ASL Video
    Comprehensibility of content    
    Visual appeal of ASL    
    Component Ability to engage with material    
    Difficulty/Ease attending to the ASL Actor and video simultaneously    
    Clarity of ASL image    
    Understanding of ASL Actor    
  3. Check your likes and dislikes (and neutral) of the following components:
  4. Dislike  Like  Did not notice 
    Subject matter       
    Characters       
    Plot       
    Use of Costumes by ASL actors       
    Borders around the videos       
    Quality of ASL ÒenunciationÓ       
  5. Would you pay to have this style of ASL added to your choice of video content? Why/Why not? 
  6. Standard ASL _____________________________
    Acted ASL _____________________________
    Control over ASL presentation (i.e. size, position)_____________________________

  7. Suggestions?
  8.  

  9. Providing ASL in these formats would add extra costs to production. For each format, rate the worthiness of these extra costs (where 1 = not at all worthy & 5 = very worthy).
  10. Standard ASL   
    1  2  3  4  5

    User-determined settings (i.e. position)   
    1  2  3  4  5 

    Acted ASL   
    1  2  3  4  5 

  11. Would you pay to have the following formats added to your choice of video?
  12. Standard ASL
    Yes   No

    User-determined settings
    Yes   No

    Acted ASL
    Yes   No

  13. What were your ASL box preferences (please check)?
  14. ASL Video Above Main Video OR ASL Video Below Main Video
    ASL Video Near Main Video; OR ASL Video Apart from Main Video
    ASL Video Smaller than Main Video OR ASL Video Larger than Main Video
    ASL Video with Border OR ASL Video without Border
  15. Did you prefer to have a frame or no frame around the video? Why?
  16. Which video option did you prefer? (Large ASL Video, Small ASL Video) Why?
  17. Did you find the video interface easy to use? What problems did you experience with it? How might we improve it?
Category Sample Comment
Quality of interpreter/actors presence and expression   Good facial expression.
  The character looks mad but the interpreter is not showing it.
Interpretation quality (speed, novel signs)   The interpreter keeps up well.
  That is the wrong sign.
Ease of using video interface (video control buttons)   The reverse is useful.
  How do I stop this thing?
Viewing preferences (position, border, size, proximity)   I like being able to move the ASL window.
  There are too many choices.
Technical issues with video (synchronicity, visibility)   Good lighting.
  The interpretation is not in synch with the video.
Content of video   It makes sense.
  Boring.
Acted vs interpreted ASL content (comparison, busyness) Acted    
Interpreted
Closed Captioning Requested   You should have captions too.

back next